grok-bot

What is a Lead Bot in a Grok Bot group?

A Lead Bot in a Grok Bot group is the coordination seat — not an “AI employee” that emails under your name. It breaks a scoped ask into specialist jobs, collects in-box artifacts, and hands the human one review pack. The Lead stops before send, publish, or pay; specialists stop the same way. The Lead owns prioritization, scoped handoffs, and the review queue. Specialists own one artifact type per job and do not widen scope alone. Done is a reviewable artifact pack the human can approve in one pass — not an open-ended chat that might fire a tool later. Keep the roster short so jobs do not collide.

Who this is for

Solo founders and small ops desks already in Cursor + Grok Bot who want a named Lead without “the bot sent something I can’t undo.” If you need the full roster and stop language, start with Grok Bot role templates that stop before send/publish/pay. If you need the handoff loop in depth, use Lead Bot + specialist Bot coordination. This FAQ owns the definition: what Lead *is*, what it owns, and what it never does alone.

Lead vs specialist (jobs, not personas)

SeatOwnsProducesNever does alone
Lead BotPrioritization, scoped handoffs, review packOne consolidated queue for the humanAuto-send / publish / pay
SpecialistOne job, one artifact type`draft.md` / checklist / brief in-boxWiden scope; leave the box

Prefer a short roster (Lead + a few specialists) over one mega-Bot that claims Chief of Staff + writer + publisher. Coordination beats a persona dump. Free “AI employee” template kits can still give you day-one labels — an agent-ops desk adds the gates. Contrast: agent-ops desk vs AI-employee template kits.

Coordination loop (approval-gated)

  1. Human (or a routine that only *starts* draft work) gives the Lead a scoped ask.
  2. Lead breaks the ask into specialist jobs: one job, one artifact type, named stop list.
  3. Specialists produce in-box artifacts — not outbound messages.
  4. Lead assembles a single review pack.
  5. Human Approves, edits, or rejects. Only then does send / publish / pay happen — and that press is human (or an explicitly granted send permission), never silent auto-fire.

Specialists do not widen the brief alone. Lead reassigns; specialists stay in the seat they were given. Secrets stay in env / secret stores — never in Bot descriptions, skills, or chat.

What the Lead never owns alone

Put these in the Lead’s Bot description in language the model can’t “creatively reinterpret”:

  1. Send — email, Slack, SMS, chat: draft only; human Approves before send.
  2. Publish — blog, social, changelog, store listing: draft artifact; human hits publish.
  3. Pay — Stripe, invoices, refunds, buys: propose; human executes.
  4. Delete / share outside the box — stop and ask.

“Done” for a Lead-run job is a reviewable artifact pack the human can approve in one pass — not an open-ended chat that might fire a tool later. Routines may schedule work; they do not grant irreversible rights. For repo agents that share the same desk, mirror stop-before-send/publish/pay in root `AGENTS.md`.

Lead failure card (pin this)

SymptomLikely causeFix
Lead sent or posted without askingStops missing from Bot descriptionPut never-send/publish/pay in the description; skills cannot override
Specialist “helps” by emailingLead delegated an outcome, not an artifactJob = file/PR/URL draft; send gate stays with human
Mega-Bot does everything poorlyOne description claims CoS + writer + publisherSplit into Lead + named specialists
Specialist widens scope mid-runNo “Lead reassigns” ruleSpecialist stays in seat; Lead re-scopes
Chat says “done” with nothing to reviewDone = conversationRedefine done as a reviewable artifact pack
Secrets appear in Lead/specialist textCredentials pasted into description/skillMove to env / secret store; scrub chat surfaces

Debug order: read Lead stop list → confirm specialist jobs are artifact-shaped → confirm skills have no send/publish/pay side effects → confirm routines only trigger drafts → then add seats.

What Cheat Sheet + Agent Starter are for

The Cheat Sheet is the skimmable roster and approval checklist for Lead + specialist desks — name it in your runbook. Soft path today: start on /free (Harness Desk Starter — seat, done-artifact skill, gate card). When you want harness depth (role pack + agent-ops files, not AI-SDR SaaS), use the Agent Starter Kit ($47).

Stay in agent-ops — never Domo-as-kit-ROI, never “replaces your team,” never free Operator Kit fluff that still auto-sends under your name. Seat templates: Grok Bot role templates…. Desk vs template-kit shelf: agent-ops desk vs AI-employee kits.

Soft next step

Name the Lead. Put never-send / publish / pay in its description. Prove one specialist handoff ends as a file the human can approve — not a send. Soft ladder: /free for the starter desk, Cheat Sheet for the roster/checklist mindset, then the Agent Starter Kit ($47) when you want the harness pack. No rush — ship the Lead gate into your own runbook either way.

FAQ

What is a Lead Bot in a Grok Bot group?+

The coordination seat. It prioritizes work, assigns scoped specialist jobs, and consolidates a human review pack. It does not auto-send, publish, or pay under the founder’s name.

What does the Lead own that specialists don’t?+

Prioritization, handoffs, and the review queue. Specialists own one artifact type per job. Lead reassigns; specialists do not widen scope alone.

Can the Lead auto-send after specialists finish?+

No. Specialists and Lead both stop at reviewable artifacts. Send / publish / pay stays behind an explicit human gate (or an explicitly granted send permission) — never silent auto-fire.

How many specialists before the roster collapses?+

Keep seats few so jobs don’t collide — typically Lead plus a small set (content, ops, support, optional launch). Prefer clear seats over seven named “AI employees.”

Where do stop rules live?+

In the Bot description (and AGENTS.md for repo agents). Skills hold how-to; routines schedule runs. Neither should override a hard stop. Detail lives in the Grok Bot role templates post.

Lead Bot vs “AI Chief of Staff” template kits?+

Template kits give starting role prompts and labels. A Lead on an agent-ops desk adds hard approval gates and defines “done” as a reviewable pack — not an outbound message. See the agent-ops desk vs AI-employee kits contrast.

What’s the soft next step?+

Write the Lead stop list into the Bot description, prove one specialist job ends as an in-box artifact, then assemble one review pack.

Get the free starter

Value first, then a kit when you are ready. No fake urgency. Start with Harness Desk Starter at /free.